Chinese love guru becomes millionaire by teaching women how to marry rich people

A “love guru” has become famous in China for teaching women how to gain financial benefits through marriage. The South China Morning Post (SCMP) reported that Qu Qu’s annual income has risen to $19.5 million as more women seek her relationship and financial advice via social media. However, many have criticized the love guru for promoting unethical or manipulative behavior in a supposedly romantic setting.

During her teachings, Qu Qu uses several code words, referring to marriage as “inside the fortress,” money as “rice,” and pregnancy as “carrying a ball.” In viral videos, the guru can be heard brazenly saying that marriages should be used to get rich and gain financial benefits.

“All relationships are essentially about exchanging benefits. Everything should be used to increase my advantage and give me more power,” she says.

Due to her controversial views, she was even once banned from the social media platform Weibo for spreading unhealthy views on relationships. Now, Qu Qu has amplified her controversial views using artificial intelligence (AI) and redirects her potential customers to private channels.

Qu Qu sells several courses online and also hosts live streams where she offers marriage and financial advice. A one-on-one consultation during the live streams costs $155, while her most popular course costs $517.

She also offers private consulting packages that cost more than $1,400. She also makes a lot of money from social media by holding workshops and seminars and helping women develop marriage strategies.

While many obviously condemn Qu Qu as a hypocrite and for encouraging women to objectify themselves, there is also a section of the population that praises her for being practical and helping women to empower themselves.

“Your approach is understandable. What’s wrong with wanting both love and money? This is a realistic society. Why shouldn’t people strive for better?” commented one Chinese user.

“She teaches girls to use men as moneymakers and promotes competition among women. But she herself earns her living by working hard and relying on their efforts. Isn’t that hypocritical?” commented another.

(With contributions from agencies)